Advertise on The Loop

Advertising rates and a variety of new placement spots are now available on The Loop. Visit our advertising page for more information.

Follow Us on Twitter

You can follow The Loop to get the latest important updates. You can also follow Jim Dalrymple’s personal messages.

Apple




Palm reports Apple to the USB Implementers Forum

By Jim DalrympleJuly 24, 2009, 10:47 am PT

Palm didn’t wait for Apple to take the next step in its ongoing battle to have the Pre sync with iTunes.

PalmWordmark 300x250 Palm reports Apple to the USB Implementers ForumPalm confirmed to AllThingsD on Friday that it has reported Apple to the USB Implementers Forum. This a members group that oversees the implementation of USB in the industry.

“Palm believes that openness and interoperability offer better experiences for users by allowing them the freedom to use the content they own without interference across devices and services, so on behalf of consumers, we have notified the USB Implementers Forum of what we believe is improper use of the Vendor ID number by another member,” said Palm spokeswoman Lynn Fox.

When Palm released the Pre it enabled the device to be seen as an iPod by Apple’s iTunes. This allowed Palm to sync with the software. But Apple wasn’t too pleased with the move and in a support note said it could disable the functionality.

Last week, with an iTunes update, it did just that. However, last night Palm released an update that re-enabled iTunes sync for Pre users.

Please take a minute to Tweet, Like, or Share this post with your friends.

Share



Follow me on Buzz Follow jdalrymple on Twitter

Email This Post Email This Post Print This Post Print This Post Post a comment

Discussion 20 comments so far

20 Responses to “Palm reports Apple to the USB Implementers Forum”

  1. Darby Lines says:

    So, did Jobs kick Rubinstein in the junk on the way out the door, or does Palm honestly not get that this behavior not only makes them look like idiots, it will ultimately hurt their customers?

  2. Peter Cohen says:

    Rubenstein was guilty of technical douchebaggery at Apple, too. Remember the time he tried to sell us all on “the megahertz myth?”

  3. I love how according to Palm, apple is “required” to allow the Pre to sync to iTunes. Even MS isn’t that bitchy

  4. Zach Weigand says:

    I don’t follow, am I missing something? How is using USB supposed to trump proprietary hardware/software integration?

  5. Peter Cohen says:

    Wow, Jim. Angry Mac Bastards hat trick! Guess we’ll be linking to this article on next week’s show.

  6. Jim Dalrymple says:

    This place has gone to shit.

  7. Shawn Craver says:

    So let me get this straight. Palm makes the Pre look like an iPod to iTunes, apparently by spoofing some part of the USB device or vendor ID. Apple then does something to iTunes to make this hack not work anymore. And Apple is the bad guy here? To me, what the Pre is doing makes it a misbehaving device that isn’t following the rules.

  8. Andy says:

    Bwah bwah bwah ! This is Palm crying to mommy. It’s pathetic.

    Why shouldn’t Apple defend their competitive advantage using THEIR software that THEY developed that manages and synchronises THEIR devices that THEY designed and developed ?

    Seriously Palm, if you want desktop sync then – um – go write your own sync software. Or read the iTunes database directly, like other devices do (it’s XML – you know, an open and easy to decipher standard ?). Don’t cry to mommy when the original software developer seeks to cut you out from doing things that probably totally violate your EULA anyway.

    Sheesh.

  9. @Peter Cohen:

    When Rubenstein said “Megahertz ≠ Performance”, that was a true statement. Although certainly Apple embellished a bit, as they usually do, of course there is truth in the myth: just look at the last five years of processor clock-speed trends.

  10. HowManoid says:

    Do Palm really think the USB IF is going to chastise Apple for not allowing another vendor to masquerade as them? Ridiculous!

  11. HowManoid: Honestly, yes, Palm probably does think that. They’ve been completely out of touch with reality for some time now.

  12. Bob Forsberg says:

    When you’re on a sinking ship you grab at anything to stay afloat. Palm’s on its last gasp for survival. Let them scream.

  13. JudieKaren says:

    Hey, Rubenstein, while you’re at it, why don’t you call the F.A.A. and report Steve Jobs for not letting you use his GulfStream V either? Maybe you also want to use his house, or his car, or how about his new liver?

  14. ex2bot says:

    Re: MHz Myth

    Yeah, Apple had to exaggerate more and more esp. towards the end. But my 2 GHz MBP is way faster than a 3.x GHz Pentium IV.

    Bot

  15. Dan says:

    I’m as much of a Mac fan as the next guy but if Apple is doing something which breaks the rules of the USB standard then that should be looked into.

    As far as the Pre being able to use iTunes…IT’S ABOUT TIME.

    If this were MS doing this the sobs and tears would be heard and seen from Saturn.

  16. Dan says:

    I thought about this a little more and I began to wonder. Isn’t this a lot like when MS designed Word 6 to run WORSE on a Mac? It’s not a direct parallel but crippling software as they did with Word 6 seems less aggressive than crippling interoperability.

    I recall that we, as a community, screamed bloody murder against MS when they did that. Why are we now not screaming blood murder against Apple for doing something that is considerably worse?

  17. Just Me says:

    The first thought that I had when the “Palm USB Masquerade” made the news was “How long would it be before someone complained to the USB folks about Palm violating design rules?” I have to say I didn’t think it was going to be Palm. I would think Palm has caused a lead projectile to penetrate their hoof.

  18. Steven says:

    Dan,
    The situations are not parallel. If Microsoft made a piece of hardware and wrote an application specifically for that hardware, no one would have the right to usurp that application for their own gain. If Apple decided they wanted to make games for Xbox, would they have the right to do that without Microsoft’s permission? Of course not.

    This is not about openess or interoperability or “crippling” software. This is about intellectual property and the rights of the property owner.

  19. Dan says:

    I stated that the situations are not parallel so we are in agreement on that point.

    Unless I am mistaken the issue is that Apple is doing things with USB to block a piece of hardware from communicating through the hardware and OS to use iTunes. USB is an open standard designed to make it more difficult for vendors to LIMIT interoperability. USB, by design, is intended to eliminate closed standards.

    If this is what Apple is doing then I see no difference from what MS has done in the past.

    If Apple wants to keep others out of iTunes then it needs to make the iPod a dongle as others have done like Quark, etc. Of course, it can’t and won’t because then it won’t be pervasive.

    My point is that it looks like Apple fans always see Apple as innocent and sometimes we need to look at our beloved company as being capable of being just as greedy and capitalistic as the next one. (Again, I’m an Apple loyal user for many years. That said, I’m more than willing to judge Apple fairly in what it does for and against other companies and it’s customers.)

    Dan

  20. [...] today and according to BusinessWeek’s Arik Hesseldahl, the group sided with Apple. Palm reported Apple to the USB Implementers Forum, a member group that oversees the implementation of USB in the industry, in late July. Palm said it [...]

Leave a Reply

SEO Tool