Google CEO Larry Page talks about Apple

It’s always the company that steals shit that thinks everyone should share.

And what the hell is this answer from Page:

I mean, obviously we talk to Apple. We have a big search relationship with Apple, and so on, and we talk to them and so on.

He sounds like Miss South Carolina Teen USA Caitlin Upton talking about “the Iraq.”



25 thoughts on “Google CEO Larry Page talks about Apple

  1. People who need to do searches such as should be able to search because some people don’t have access to Androids and this is because the Apple is protecting IP.

  2. His Apple answers are all dodges. I like the exchange ” Google Plus was a big bet / Is a bit bet” . Does he really think it still has a shot?

  3. What did Google steal from Apple? Please provide examples. And the search relationship he was talking about is the deal where Google pays Apple about 1 billion dollars to be the default search engine. And I think he wasn’t trying to say too much singe repeated himself.

  4. Wait doesn’t everyone want the companies to share. You would want iTunes on an Android phone, or Office for iOS, or every Google service on Windows Phone.

  5. have you been sleeping in class again.

    There are 100+ lawsuits around the world involving
    Apple and Android partners.
    There has been injunctions.
    $1 Billion award.
    There has been removal of features in Android due
    to said injunctions.

  6. One, these are patents,which are known to be ridiculous, and if that is the case every case Apple lost to Samsung in other parts of the world, were all things Apple “stolen” from Samsung. And Android partners, not Google.

  7. Google doesn’t design products the Android hardware partners do, and also they didn’t steal software, they adapted it, something RIM, Microsoft, and Nokia should of done. If they stole it like you said, Apple would have sued them by now.

    Apple released a new Apple Tv that is shaped like a Roku, did they steal that? The iPhone 5 is widescreen was that stolen?

  8. What are you talking about? Why would you want to have to be tied down to one service? Where they could potentially charge you more.

  9. I’d rather each platform competed for my attention with its own strengths. “Services” are available on all of them in different forms.

  10. I really don’t know why anyone would want that. Why would you want to have to use an Android for every Google property, including YouTube, Gmail, and search? Apple products would be pretty hardware with so-so software if you had to use Apple’s.

  11. You’re entitled to your opinion, even though you’re ignoring the fact that it was Apple’s software that pretty much set the standard for post-2007 smartphones.

  12. Yes for things like layout, not for services. Your talking about a grid of clickable squares and I’m talking more useful things like email.

  13. these are patents,which are known to be ridiculous,

    Except for the fact that the final arbiter of the validity of patents is the courts, and Apple is winning more than it’s losing. What you think of the patent system, and what you think of Apple’s patents, is entirely irrelevant to the reality of Apple’s lawsuits against competitors whom in some cases, ripped off Apple’s designs wholesale. This isn’t the 90s anymore. Apple is not going to be the free R&D lab for the rest of the industry.

  14. Samsung won against Apple for a patent on 3G, but sense patents
    aren’t ridiculous, this is justified.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *