Making Sense of Technology
Advertising rates and a variety of new placement spots are now available on The Loop. Visit our advertising page for more information.
You can follow The Loop to get the latest important updates. You can also follow Jim Dalrymple’s personal messages.
By Peter CohenDecember 4, 2009, 8:24 am PT
Apple has quietly introduced a new option for its high-end desktop computer, the Mac Pro, offering the system with a single 3.3GHz Quad-Core Intel microprocessor. The new option is available for $3,699 – $1,200 more than the base price of a 2.66GHz Quad-Core equipped model.
The Eight-Core Mac Pro remains available and unchanged with two 2.26GHz, 2.66GHz or 2.93GHz Quad-Core Intel Xeon microprocessors, priced starting at $3,299.
The addition of the 3.3GHz Quad-Core Mac Pro helps add some distance between the Quad-Core Mac Pro and from the 27-inch Quad-Core-equipped iMac introduced in October. Benchmarks reveal that the Quad-Core iMac outperforms the low-end Quad-Core Mac Pro.
What’s more, a 2 terabyte (TB) 7200RPM Serial ATA (SATA) hard disk drive is now available as a storage option on configure-to-order Mac Pros (as well as Apple’s rack-mount Xserve). The 2TB drive mechanism costs an extra $350 when upgrading from the stock 640GB drive included with the Mac Pro, or $550 for one of the three open bays. So the maximum internal storage capacity for a Mac Pro available from the factory is now 8TB; Xserves can now be equipped with up to 6TB of internal storage.
While convenient for users ordering new equipment fresh from the factory, it’s worth noting that street prices of 7200RPM SATA hard drive are less than half what Apple charges. It’s trivial to install new drives in a Mac Pro, which was designed for easily user-accessible expansion: internal SATA drives are mounted using sliding trays included with the system. Customers on a tight budget with no qualms about opening their computer are advised to check third-party hard drive retailers instead.
Hat tip: AppleInsider
Please take a minute to Tweet, Like, or Share this post with your friends.
TweetShare
According to Macworld, the quad-core iMac is faster than the eight-core Mac Pro.
Which really demonstrates nothing more than how badly managed Speedmark 6. If you look at the parameters they use, they’re not even relevant to the real-world anymore. People buying Mac Pros are not paying that kind of money to import 25 MP3s, play with a 50MB Photoshop file, or import 2 minutes of video.
If you’re using an a app that can actually leverage all 8 cores (or up to 16 if can take advantage of hyperthreading) the 8-core Mac Pro will blow everything else away.
How about a benchmark where they’re manipulating an 8GB Photoshop file while exporting a 1080p video at the same time? That’s what people with this metal are doing.
I’m waiting for Gulftown to appraise what’s up.
Peter, I’m glad you called out the Mac Pro’s drive bays. After enduring the messy cable tangle and unelegant “click” of various PC towers, the Mac Pro is an altogether superior experience. Even a shaky-hands like myself found it really easy to install new drives in the bays. As long as you know how to operate a screwdriver and use a reasonable degree of force to remove and re-insert the drive sleds, you’re in for a treat!