<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Apple wins legal battle against Psystar</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.loopinsight.com/2009/11/14/apple-wins-legal-battle-against-psystar/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.loopinsight.com/2009/11/14/apple-wins-legal-battle-against-psystar/</link>
	<description>Making Sense of Technology</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 13 Mar 2010 10:41:05 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Matt</title>
		<link>http://www.loopinsight.com/2009/11/14/apple-wins-legal-battle-against-psystar/comment-page-1/#comment-7204</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 02:41:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.loopinsight.com/?p=2570#comment-7204</guid>
		<description>I can&#039;t believe that Psystar thought that they would win this. Apple tried playing around with clones awhile back and I&#039;m sure after they abandoned that, they made sure to close any potential loopholes for future hardware makers.

I am all for competition as it drives down costs and raises innovation (usually), however I think one of Apple&#039;s keys to success is the fact that they control the hardware and core OS software. When they design/code the OS, they know what each and every user could be running from a hardware standpoint; that&#039;s something that Microsoft will never be able to compare to.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can&#8217;t believe that Psystar thought that they would win this. Apple tried playing around with clones awhile back and I&#8217;m sure after they abandoned that, they made sure to close any potential loopholes for future hardware makers.</p>
<p>I am all for competition as it drives down costs and raises innovation (usually), however I think one of Apple&#8217;s keys to success is the fact that they control the hardware and core OS software. When they design/code the OS, they know what each and every user could be running from a hardware standpoint; that&#8217;s something that Microsoft will never be able to compare to.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim Dalrymple</title>
		<link>http://www.loopinsight.com/2009/11/14/apple-wins-legal-battle-against-psystar/comment-page-1/#comment-7173</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim Dalrymple</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Nov 2009 15:19:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.loopinsight.com/?p=2570#comment-7173</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s right. I&#039;m not sure if we&#039;ll ever find that out, but it&#039;s still a lingering question.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s right. I&#8217;m not sure if we&#8217;ll ever find that out, but it&#8217;s still a lingering question.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hairy Goomer</title>
		<link>http://www.loopinsight.com/2009/11/14/apple-wins-legal-battle-against-psystar/comment-page-1/#comment-7168</link>
		<dc:creator>Hairy Goomer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Nov 2009 14:35:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.loopinsight.com/?p=2570#comment-7168</guid>
		<description>Now we need to find out who funded these rip-off artists.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Now we need to find out who funded these rip-off artists.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
