<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Rogue Amoeba drops iPhone development, cites App Store approval process</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.loopinsight.com/2009/11/13/rogue-amoeba-drops-iphone-development-cites-app-store-approval-process/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.loopinsight.com/2009/11/13/rogue-amoeba-drops-iphone-development-cites-app-store-approval-process/</link>
	<description>Making Sense of Technology</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 31 Jul 2010 01:40:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carl Partridge</title>
		<link>http://www.loopinsight.com/2009/11/13/rogue-amoeba-drops-iphone-development-cites-app-store-approval-process/#comment-9692</link>
		<dc:creator>Carl Partridge</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Dec 2009 14:05:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.loopinsight.com/?p=2560#comment-9692</guid>
		<description>I can see both sides of the argument, but I think the previous poster is being a little unfair implying that Kafasis is being immature or hot-headed.  Clearly, this is something that Rogue amoeba have *already* tried to solve through the appropriate, normal channels - it&#039;s not as though they came up against this problem last week.  Therefore, one could also see that from their point of view, this is an action of last resort, as opposed to some sort of spotaneous &quot;rattle out of the pram&quot; moment.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can see both sides of the argument, but I think the previous poster is being a little unfair implying that Kafasis is being immature or hot-headed.  Clearly, this is something that Rogue amoeba have *already* tried to solve through the appropriate, normal channels &#8211; it&#8217;s not as though they came up against this problem last week.  Therefore, one could also see that from their point of view, this is an action of last resort, as opposed to some sort of spotaneous &#8220;rattle out of the pram&#8221; moment.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SteveS</title>
		<link>http://www.loopinsight.com/2009/11/13/rogue-amoeba-drops-iphone-development-cites-app-store-approval-process/#comment-7413</link>
		<dc:creator>SteveS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 17:59:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.loopinsight.com/?p=2560#comment-7413</guid>
		<description>While I&#039;m sure Kafasis has legitimate cause for frustration, his response to this problem seems to overshadow anything Apple has done wrong here.  Kafasis comes off as the kid in the sandbox that pouts when he doesn&#039;t get his way, so he takes his toys and runs home. 

On some level, I do sympathize with his cause.  However, his tantrums would be better directed toward Apple itself rather than raising a $h!tstorm in the blogosphere.  As a consumer, why would I ever purchase his product that admittedly would rarely if ever be updated again?  I&#039;m glad he&#039;s focusing on the Mac platform again (as other developers should), but with such an attitude, I&#039;m not sure I&#039;d want to support his company&#039;s efforts going forward.

I would certainly agree that the app store has issues from a developer&#039;s perspective.  He&#039;s not the first to raise such issues.  However, having a gate keeper control the type and quality of software delivered isn&#039;t necessarily a bad thing.  From a security perspective, jailbroken phones have already proven to be more at risk.  Kafasis argues that any developer should be allowed to make any program available, however, he ignores the fact that Apple likely has a contractual obligation to protect the integrity of the carrier&#039;s network.

Kafasis needs to calm down, mature a little bit and consider what&#039;s best for his company from a practical perspective rather than from the emotional perspective which is clearly driving his decisions right now.  He also needs to consider the value of public relations and understand that such public tantrums will likely hurt his business in the long run.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While I&#8217;m sure Kafasis has legitimate cause for frustration, his response to this problem seems to overshadow anything Apple has done wrong here.  Kafasis comes off as the kid in the sandbox that pouts when he doesn&#8217;t get his way, so he takes his toys and runs home. </p>
<p>On some level, I do sympathize with his cause.  However, his tantrums would be better directed toward Apple itself rather than raising a $h!tstorm in the blogosphere.  As a consumer, why would I ever purchase his product that admittedly would rarely if ever be updated again?  I&#8217;m glad he&#8217;s focusing on the Mac platform again (as other developers should), but with such an attitude, I&#8217;m not sure I&#8217;d want to support his company&#8217;s efforts going forward.</p>
<p>I would certainly agree that the app store has issues from a developer&#8217;s perspective.  He&#8217;s not the first to raise such issues.  However, having a gate keeper control the type and quality of software delivered isn&#8217;t necessarily a bad thing.  From a security perspective, jailbroken phones have already proven to be more at risk.  Kafasis argues that any developer should be allowed to make any program available, however, he ignores the fact that Apple likely has a contractual obligation to protect the integrity of the carrier&#8217;s network.</p>
<p>Kafasis needs to calm down, mature a little bit and consider what&#8217;s best for his company from a practical perspective rather than from the emotional perspective which is clearly driving his decisions right now.  He also needs to consider the value of public relations and understand that such public tantrums will likely hurt his business in the long run.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
