<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Apple denies rejecting Google Voice from the App Store</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.loopinsight.com/2009/08/21/apple-denies-rejecting-google-voice-from-the-app-store/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.loopinsight.com/2009/08/21/apple-denies-rejecting-google-voice-from-the-app-store/</link>
	<description>Making Sense of Technology</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 31 Jul 2010 01:40:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Levinson quits Google&#8217;s board, stays with Apple &#124; The Loop</title>
		<link>http://www.loopinsight.com/2009/08/21/apple-denies-rejecting-google-voice-from-the-app-store/#comment-4558</link>
		<dc:creator>Levinson quits Google&#8217;s board, stays with Apple &#124; The Loop</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Oct 2009 14:23:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.loopinsight.com/?p=1293#comment-4558</guid>
		<description>[...] Apple denied the app had been rejected, Google said it was and gave details of conversations between the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Apple denied the app had been rejected, Google said it was and gave details of conversations between the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Apple amending iPhone developer agreement to include VoIP apps &#124; The Loop</title>
		<link>http://www.loopinsight.com/2009/08/21/apple-denies-rejecting-google-voice-from-the-app-store/#comment-4320</link>
		<dc:creator>Apple amending iPhone developer agreement to include VoIP apps &#124; The Loop</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2009 01:26:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.loopinsight.com/?p=1293#comment-4320</guid>
		<description>[...] and AT&amp;T were asked by the FCC in September why Google Voice was rejected. Apple said the app was never rejected, although Google maintains it was.SHARETHIS.addEntry({ title: &quot;Apple amending iPhone developer [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] and AT&amp;T were asked by the FCC in September why Google Voice was rejected. Apple said the app was never rejected, although Google maintains it was.SHARETHIS.addEntry({ title: &quot;Apple amending iPhone developer [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Apple responds to Google&#8217;s FCC letter &#124; The Loop</title>
		<link>http://www.loopinsight.com/2009/08/21/apple-denies-rejecting-google-voice-from-the-app-store/#comment-3086</link>
		<dc:creator>Apple responds to Google&#8217;s FCC letter &#124; The Loop</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Sep 2009 19:38:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.loopinsight.com/?p=1293#comment-3086</guid>
		<description>[...] said in its original letter to the FCC that Google Voice was still being considered for the App Store. &#8220;Contrary to published [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] said in its original letter to the FCC that Google Voice was still being considered for the App Store. &#8220;Contrary to published [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Apple confirms Vonage iPhone app delayed for technical reasons &#124; The Loop</title>
		<link>http://www.loopinsight.com/2009/08/21/apple-denies-rejecting-google-voice-from-the-app-store/#comment-2084</link>
		<dc:creator>Apple confirms Vonage iPhone app delayed for technical reasons &#124; The Loop</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Aug 2009 21:51:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.loopinsight.com/?p=1293#comment-2084</guid>
		<description>[...] its letter to the FCC discussing Google&#8217;s Voice app, Apple said that apps submitted to the App Store &#8220;undergo a rigorous review process that [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] its letter to the FCC discussing Google&#8217;s Voice app, Apple said that apps submitted to the App Store &#8220;undergo a rigorous review process that [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel Swanson</title>
		<link>http://www.loopinsight.com/2009/08/21/apple-denies-rejecting-google-voice-from-the-app-store/#comment-1971</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel Swanson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Aug 2009 12:54:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.loopinsight.com/?p=1293#comment-1971</guid>
		<description>I detest this sort of &quot;I know better how to run its business than Apple&quot;-kind of attitude, based, or at least blithely colored by gossip-quality &quot;data.&quot;

For better or for worse, Apple is in charge of its iPhone system, what is allowed in, and just what those apps can do.

Apple&#039;s success with its iPhone is due in no small part to the integrity and consistency of the &quot;user experience&quot; which has been carefully crafted in its system and user interface.

Its approval process, no matter how apparently flawed to some, is designed to preserve those aspects of the iPhone.

To expect that Apple would willy-nilly give up that control so that Google or any other third party developer could rip into and/or bypass that system with its apps is completely insane.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I detest this sort of &#8220;I know better how to run its business than Apple&#8221;-kind of attitude, based, or at least blithely colored by gossip-quality &#8220;data.&#8221;</p>
<p>For better or for worse, Apple is in charge of its iPhone system, what is allowed in, and just what those apps can do.</p>
<p>Apple&#8217;s success with its iPhone is due in no small part to the integrity and consistency of the &#8220;user experience&#8221; which has been carefully crafted in its system and user interface.</p>
<p>Its approval process, no matter how apparently flawed to some, is designed to preserve those aspects of the iPhone.</p>
<p>To expect that Apple would willy-nilly give up that control so that Google or any other third party developer could rip into and/or bypass that system with its apps is completely insane.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim Dalrymple</title>
		<link>http://www.loopinsight.com/2009/08/21/apple-denies-rejecting-google-voice-from-the-app-store/#comment-1960</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim Dalrymple</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Aug 2009 06:45:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.loopinsight.com/?p=1293#comment-1960</guid>
		<description>It does make you wonder.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It does make you wonder.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Mackler</title>
		<link>http://www.loopinsight.com/2009/08/21/apple-denies-rejecting-google-voice-from-the-app-store/#comment-1957</link>
		<dc:creator>David Mackler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Aug 2009 05:48:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.loopinsight.com/?p=1293#comment-1957</guid>
		<description>Hmmm, &quot;not approved&quot; seems kind of fishy. I am disappointed that whilst we read of Apple&#039;s response to the FCC, the relevant and interesting answers in Google&#039;s response was redacted. Perhaps there really is another side to this story?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmmm, &#8220;not approved&#8221; seems kind of fishy. I am disappointed that whilst we read of Apple&#8217;s response to the FCC, the relevant and interesting answers in Google&#8217;s response was redacted. Perhaps there really is another side to this story?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
